|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha : |
14/10/2014 |
Actualizado : |
07/11/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
BRAMBILLASCA, S.; BRITOS, A.; DELUCA, C.; FRAGA, M.; CAJARVILLE, C. |
Afiliación : |
MARTIN FRAGA COTELO, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay./Departamento de Microbiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
Título : |
Addition of citrus pulp and apple pomace in diets for dogs: influence on fermentation kinetics, digestion, faecal characteristics and bacterial populations. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2013 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Archives of Animal Nutrition, v. 67, n. 6, p. 492-502, 2013. |
ISSN : |
1745-039X. |
DOI : |
10.1080/1745039X.2013.857079. |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 26 July 2013/ Accepted 4 October 2013. |
Palabras claves : |
FERMENTACIÓN INTESTINAL; HECES; PULPA DE CITRUS; PULPA DE MANZANA. |
Thesagro : |
ALIMENTACIÓN; BACTERIAS; DIGESTIBILIDAD; DIGESTIÓN; FIBRA; FLORA INTESTINAL; PERRO. |
Asunto categoría : |
L51 Fisiología Animal - Nutrición |
Marc : |
LEADER 01038naa a2200325 a 4500 001 1051062 005 2019-11-07 008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1745-039X. 024 7 $a10.1080/1745039X.2013.857079.$2DOI 100 1 $aBRAMBILLASCA, S. 245 $aAddition of citrus pulp and apple pomace in diets for dogs$binfluence on fermentation kinetics, digestion, faecal characteristics and bacterial populations.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2013 500 $aArticle history: Received 26 July 2013/ Accepted 4 October 2013. 650 $aALIMENTACIÓN 650 $aBACTERIAS 650 $aDIGESTIBILIDAD 650 $aDIGESTIÓN 650 $aFIBRA 650 $aFLORA INTESTINAL 650 $aPERRO 653 $aFERMENTACIÓN INTESTINAL 653 $aHECES 653 $aPULPA DE CITRUS 653 $aPULPA DE MANZANA 700 1 $aBRITOS, A. 700 1 $aDELUCA, C. 700 1 $aFRAGA, M. 700 1 $aCAJARVILLE, C. 773 $tArchives of Animal Nutrition$gv. 67, n. 6, p. 492-502, 2013.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
20/05/2022 |
Actualizado : |
20/05/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
SESSIM, A. G.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; PEREIRA, G. R.; CASTILHO, E. M.; BARCELLOS, J. O. J. |
Afiliación : |
AMIR GIL SESSIM, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GABRIEL RIBAS PEREIRA, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; EDUARDO MADEIRA CASTILHO, Federal University of Pelotas, UFPEL, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Pelotas, Brazil; JÚLIO OTÁVIO JARDIM BARCELLOS, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil. |
Título : |
Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2022, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 127 - 144. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5888 |
ISSN : |
2007-1124; e-ISSN: 2448-6698 |
DOI : |
10.22319/RMCP.V13I1.5888 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 3 December 2020; Accepted 07 June 2021; Published January 2022.
Publisher: INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. Corresponding author: Sessim, A.G.; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:amirsessim@hotmail.com -- This study was supported by the Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Project CNPq No. 133454/2014-2) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD No. 2842/2010). Licencia: licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization.
© 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization.
© 2022 INIFAP-CENI... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Animal production; Economy; Gross revenue; Integration; PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL; Production cost. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
URL : |
https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/download/5888/4707
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03152naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1063153 005 2022-05-20 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a2007-1124; e-ISSN: 2448-6698 024 7 $a10.22319/RMCP.V13I1.5888$2DOI 100 1 $aSESSIM, A. G. 245 $aFinancial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aArticle history: Received 3 December 2020; Accepted 07 June 2021; Published January 2022. Publisher: INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. Corresponding author: Sessim, A.G.; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:amirsessim@hotmail.com -- This study was supported by the Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Project CNPq No. 133454/2014-2) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD No. 2842/2010). Licencia: licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. 520 $aABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization. © 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved. 653 $aAnimal production 653 $aEconomy 653 $aGross revenue 653 $aIntegration 653 $aPLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL 653 $aProduction cost 700 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, G. R. 700 1 $aCASTILHO, E. M. 700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J. O. J. 773 $tRevista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2022, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 127 - 144. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5888
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|